Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EDWARD GAUSE, Plaintiff v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

Since plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis, he must serve the defendants as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m):

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.

Plaintiff must effect proper service under Rule 4 on defendants and make proof of service under Rule 4(1)(1) on or before September 4, 2023, or the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice as provided in Rule 4(m) as to any defendant not served. If plaintiff wants the Marshal to make service (at plaintiff's expense) on the defendants he should file a motion requesting an order to that effect.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Gause v. Pa. Dep't of Corrs.
(Jun 1, 2023)