MARK A. GOLDSMITH, J.
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT (Dkt. 67)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, J.
The Court has reviewed the following document: Def. Resp. to Mot. for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 67). The Court finds that it should be stricken for the following reason(s):
[ ] Missing or insufficient statement of non-concurrence. See LR 7.1(a).
[ ] Over-length. See LR 7.1(d)(3).
[] Wrong font size. See LR 5.1(a)(3).
[ ] Missing required information (e.g., concise statement of issues, controlling or most appropriate authority, etc.). See LR 7.1(d)(2).
[ ] Improperly formatted (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, missing page numbers, etc.). See LR 5.1(a)(2).
[ ] Does not comply with the Case Management Order in this case for the following reasons: ______________
[√] Other: Defendant's response does not contain the local rules certification in accordance with this Court's June 3, 2019 order (Dkt. 5).
Accordingly, the Court strikes the document. shall file a collected document that complies with all requirements on or before * '.
SO ORDERED.