Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SET CAPITAL LLC, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, CREDIT SUISSE AG, CREDIT SUISSE INTERNATIONAL, TIDJANE THIAM, DAVID R. MATHERS, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC, JANUS INDEX & CALCULATION SERVICES LLC, and JANUS DISTRIBUTORS LLC d/b/a/ JANUS HENDERSON DISTRIBUTORS, Defendants.

SARAH NETBURN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Upon review of the parties' letters at ECF Nos. 236, 241, 249, and 250, the Court finds good cause to permit the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Credit Suisse, and that the disputed topics fall within the broad relevance standard in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). Accordingly, the deposition may cover Topic 1 and the entirety of Topic 2 as defined in Plaintiff's letter at ECF No. 249.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Set Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Grp. AG
(Mar 1, 2023)