Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

MIKE VIGIL, Appellant, v. MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; OCEAN AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, ' Respondents.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting an amended motion to quash service, denying a motion to dismiss, denying a motion to strike, and directing appellant to file an amended complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Veronica Barisich, Judge.

Our preliminary review of the documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the above-mentioned order. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

CADISH J. PICKERING J. BELL JUDGES 1

Hon. Veronica Barisich, District Judge Mike Vigil 2

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Vigil v. Midas Int'l Corp.
(Feb 3, 2023)