Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

Shateria Morse, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Morse's Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 14.) A court may issue a certificate of appealability “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A § 2255 movant makes a “substantial showing” by establishing reasonable jurists could debate the outcome of the order or the issues addressed in the order deserve encouragement to proceed further. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Morse has not met the standard for a certificate of appealability. The Court cannot conclude that reasonable jurists would debate the outcome in its January 13, 2023 Order, nor that the issues addressed in the Order deserve encouragement to proceed further. // // //

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Morse's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 14) is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Morse v. United States
(Feb 1, 2023)