AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

Kyle Williams, Plaintiff, v. Susan Sheffield, Defendant.

MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations in this case. ECF No. 25. No objections were filed within the fourteen-day window. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is now ripe for review and the District Judge thus reviews the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

Finding no plain error or manifest injustice in the Magistrate's reasoning, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) Sheffield's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as futile.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Williams v. Sheffield
(Feb 1, 2023)