AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

LT. COL. (RET.) JOE A. PUTNAM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, Defendant.

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge

ORDER

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge

Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Putnam v. United States Army Review Bd. Agency
(Jan 3, 2023)