Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALEXANDER JIGGETTS, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR MARYLAND JUDGE JULIE RUBIN, Defendant.

DANIEL J. STEWART, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

APPEARANCES:

OF COUNSEL:

ALEXANDER JIGGETTS

Plaintiff Pro Se

ORDER

DANIEL J. STEWART, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Clerk has sent for review a civil Complaint filed by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, but instead submitted a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. No. 2. After reviewing the submission, the Court finds that Plaintiff meets the requirement for economic need and thus may properly proceed with this matter in forma pauperis. 1

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jiggetts v. Rubin
(Dec 1, 2022)