Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR, Plaintiff v. J. DANIEL HOFFMAN, Defendant

Thomas McKeon, Justice Maine Supreme Judicial Court

ORDER ACCEPTING SURRENDER M. BAR R. 25(d)

Thomas McKeon, Justice Maine Supreme Judicial Court

1. This matter is before the Court on an Information filed by the Board of Overseers of the Bar (the "Board").

2. Pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d) Defendant has submitted to the Board of Overseers a Letter of Surrender of License ("Surrender"). Pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d), Defendant has stated that the Surrender is freely and voluntarily rendered, he is not subject to coercion or duress, and he is fully aware of the implications of surrender. Also pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d), Defendant has stated that he is aware that there is presently pending an investigation into allegations of misconduct, the nature of which Defendant has set forth in his accompanying Affidavit ("Affidavit"), which is attached hereto and which is impounded pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d)(3). Finally, Defendant acknowledges, pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d), that specified material portions of the underlying allegations could be proven, if those said facts were found to be credible by the Court.

3. Defendant agrees that, pursuant to M. Bar R. 25(d)(4), he may be reinstated only upon petition filed in the Court after at least 5 years from the effective date of surrender.

4. The Defendant's Surrender of his license is hereby accepted by the Court, pursuant to the terms set forth in this Order, and the Board's Information dated April 5, 2021, is hereby rendered moot and dismissed. The Defendant's Surrender will be effective as of, November 1, 2022, and he will be prohibited from practicing law thereafter.

5. This Order does not prohibit Bar Counsel from requesting that the investigation underlying its Information be considered in any reinstatement proceeding and allows the Grievance Commission and Court to consider all prior disciplinary history, including the Information discussed in this Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Hoffman
(Nov 1, 2022)