Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

J. Wickramaratna, also known as Jac Wright, Appellant v. Donald J. Trump, Appellee

PER CURIAM

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA No. 1:21-cv-03296-UNA

BEFORE: Rao and Childs, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed January 18, 2022, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case without prejudice as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (explaining that a complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact").

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wickramaratna v. Trump
(Nov 1, 2022)