AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISMAEL PACHECO (1); RAYSEAN THOMAS (2), Defendants.

JINSOOK OHTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING/TRIAL SETTING

JINSOOK OHTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On September 30, 2022, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Continue the Motion Hearing/Trial Setting currently set for October 7, 2022 to November 18, 2022. For good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion to continue [Dkt. 22] and sets the Motion Hearing/Trial Setting on November 18, 2022 at 10:30 a.m.

For the reasons set forth in the joint motion, the Court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting the requested continuance, and these outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the delay occasioned by this continuance is excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Further, on September 23, 2022, Defendant Raysean Thomas filed a pretrial motion that remains pending. Accordingly, the Court finds that time from September 23, 2022 to November 18,2022 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act on grounds that a pretrial motion is pending. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D). This time is also excluded as to the coDefendant. United States v. Messer, 197 F.3d 330, 336 (9th Cir. 1999) (“It is well established that an exclusion from the Speedy Trial clock for one defendant applies to all codefendants.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Pacheco
(Oct 3, 2022)