AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

P&G CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS, LLC, as Assignee of Larry White Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

SUSAN K. LEE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

SUSAN K. LEE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Plaintiff P&G Construction Consultants, LLC, as Assignee of Larry White's counsel (“Plaintiff”), Toby Gammill and the Gammill Law Group (“Attorney Gammill”) [Doc. 32]. The motion fails to fully comply with the requirements of Eastern District of Tennessee Local Rule 83.4(g). For instance, E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(g)(2) requires that, where there is no other attorney of record, the motion to withdraw, must include the current mailing address and telephone number of the client. Further, E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(g)(3), in situations where consent of the client is not obtained, requires certification that a copy of the motion to withdraw was provided to Plaintiff at least 14 days prior to the date the motion was filed. Moreover, the motion does not address the “extraordinary circumstances” required by E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(g) given that Plaintiff is alleged to be a domestic corporation.

Because the pending motion to withdraw does not fully comply with Local Rule 83.4(g), the Court lacks sufficient information to comfortably consider the motion or schedule a hearing on the motion. Accordingly, Attorney Gammill's motion to withdraw [Doc. 32] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the refiling of a proper motion to withdraw or substitute counsel that fully complies with the applicable local rules.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

P&G Constr. Consultants v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.
(Sep 2, 2022)