AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

BRANDY R. MCKINNON, Plaintiff, v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC. AND KIM GREENLEE Defendants.

RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Previously, Plaintiff Brandy McKinnon moved to nullify an arbitration award issued in favor of defendants Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (“HLS”) and Kim Greenlee. Dkt. No. 81. In addition, HLS and Greenlee moved to confirm the same. Dkt. No. 87. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 90. The parties filed objections thereto. Dkt. Nos. 94, 96. After a review of the objections, Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Supplemental Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 97, recommending (1) the denial of McKinnon's motion to nullify arbitration and (2) the grant of HLS's motion to confirm arbitration and dismiss with prejudice McKinnon's claims against HLS and Greenlee. McKinnon filed a further objection, Dkt. No. 99.

After conducting a de novo review of the relevant filings, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, and concludes that the McKinnon's Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES McKinnon's Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, and orders that McKinnon's motion to nullify arbitration, Dkt. No. 81, is DENIED and that HLS's and Greenlee's motion to confirm arbitration, Dkt. No. 87, is GRANTED to confirm arbitration and DISMISS-WITH-PREJUDICE McKinnon's claims against HLS and Greenlee.

So Ordered this

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKinnon v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
(Aug 1, 2022)