Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DONAT CALEB PORTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General of North Carolina; ROXANN H. VANEEKHOVEN; JENNIFER M. TAYLOR; CASEY E. WALLACE; MARTIN B. MCGEE; DAVID BRENT CLONINGER; BENJAMIN G. GOFF; VAN SHAW; DAVID BRADSON RILEY; JOSH W. HELMS; JAMES N. BAILEY; KEVIN PFISTER; DUSTIN GROOMS; JAMES ROMINGER; CITY OF CONCORD, Defendants - Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: March 23, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00573-LCB-JEP)

Donat Caleb Porter, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Martin Koch, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD M. KOCH, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Steven Andrew Bader, Raleigh, North Carolina, Patrick Houghton Flanagan, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Donat Caleb Porter appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Porter v. Garland, No. 1:20-cv-00573-LCB-JEP (M.D. N.C. Aug. 6, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Porter v. Garland
(Jul 28, 2022)