PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: June 28, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (2:20-cv-03831-RBH)
Benjamin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Benjamin Johnson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Johnson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the denial of relief on Johnson's claims against Defendant Bryan Stirling. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Johnson v. Stirling, No. 2:20-cv-03831-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 8, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Despite receiving notice of his right to do so, Johnson failed to object to the recommended disposition of the claim against Defendant April Clarke and, therefore, has waived appellate review of that claim. See Martin v. Duffy, 898 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017).