Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

KENYON, Respondent, v. GOODALL&CO., Appellants

         Where property sold is defective, the measure of damages is the difference in value between it, as it is in fact and as it ought to have been. (3 Barb. 424; Sedg. on Damages, 287, 289, 290; 2 Greenl. Ev. 266, sec. 262.)

         JUDGES: Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The referee erred in his estimate of the damages. The loss of time, value of services, and wages of employees, caused by the failure of the respondents to perform their contract, are damages by no means remote, but on the contrary strictly proximate and immediate. They ought to have been considered and allowed.

         The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Kenyon v. Goodall & Co.
(Oct 1, 1853)