Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

WHITE and WENTWORTH, Appellants, v. ABERNATHY, CLARK&CO., Respondents

3 Cal. 426 WHITE and WENTWORTH, Appellants, v. ABERNATHY, CLARK & CO., Respondents Supreme Court of California October, 1853

         Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco.

         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Heydenfeldt, Justice. Murray, Chief Justice, concurring.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The record contains no relation of the facts as they were disclosed in the Court below, and the only bill of exceptions is one which contains the directions of the Court to the jury. All intendments must be in favor of sustaining the judgments of Courts of original jurisdiction, and to disturb such judgment, it is not sufficient that error may have intervened, but it must be affirmatively shown by the record. Therefore, the naked directions of a Court, unaccompanied with any statement of facts, cannot satisfy us of substantial error, although some of the directions may not be in consonance with the rules of law. They may be, in reference to the facts, merely abstract, or only detrimental to the party not complaining of error, or totally inapt to mislead the jury.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

White v. Abernathy, Clark & Co.
(Oct 1, 1853)