Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

E. FITZGERALD and A. F. BROWN, Appellants, v. WM. R. GORHAM, Sheriff, Respondent

         JUDGES: Mr. J. Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         By the 15th section of the Statute of Frauds of this State, it is made conclusive evidence of fraud in the sale of goods, unless the sale is " accompanied by an immediate delivery, and be followed by an actual and continued change of possession."

         In this case there was, at the most, a mere constructive change of possession. Josephs was continued in charge and control over the goods; and although the sale to the plaintiffs was in good faith, and Josephs was in like good faith their agent or clerk, yet the very case is presented upon which the statute intended to operate.

         The continued change of possession must be " actual," and not constructive.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Fitzgerald v. Gorham
(Oct 1, 1854)