Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

M. Carriere, Respondent, v. Charles Minturn&others, Appellants

         No briefs on file.

         JUDGES: Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, C. J., concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The only difference between this case and that of Gronfier v. Minturn, decided at this Term, consists of the point made by appellants, that there is no allegation in the declaration that five per cent. was reasonable counsel fees. Such an averment was unnecessary. The counsel fees stipulated to be paid were not the cause of the action, but, like the costs, a mere incident to it, and may be fixed by the Chancellor, at his discretion, not exceeding the amount stipulated. Nor is such an allowance in the nature of a penalty, but only a provision against an actual expense to be incurred by the creditor on account of the failure of the debtor to fulfil his contract.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Carriere v. Minturn
(Oct 1, 1855)