Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Azariah Walker, Appellant, v. Thomas Sedgwick, Respondent

         JUDGES: Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Bryan, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The parties agree by stipulation to submit this case upon the single point, that the Judge below failed to find the facts and conclusions of law.

         This is a case in Chancery to enforce a vendor's lien for the purchase money. In Chancery cases this Court has to examine the facts, and is not concluded by the findings of the Chancellor. The statute regulation does not therefore apply in such cases, because it would be utterly fruitless and lex non cogit ad vana. The statute was intended for cases in which the trial by the Judge supplied the place of a trial by jury, where the parties consent to it; and we have long ago determined that in Chancery cases the parties were not entitled to trial by jury.

         Judgment affirmed.

This case is doubted, Duff v. Fisher , 15 Cal. 375, and affirmed, though disapproved,

Lyons Lyons Still Saunders Bodley Ferguson Sharon Sharon
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Walker v. Sedgwick
(Apr 1, 1855)