Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Joshua W. Redman&John Yontz, Respondents, v. Maria Y. Gulnac, Appellant

         JUDGES: Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Bryan, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         It was error, after the jury had retired, to allow them to come into Court and instruct them, in the absence of the parties or their counsel.

         Such instructions will be considered important if the contrary is not shown, from the very fact that the jury have asked for them. The certificate of the Judge of the Court below is a sufficient authentication of the statement. An appellant cannot be defeated of his rights by any such proceeding. If the respondent did not think proper to file amendments, or the Judge to correct the statement, the certificate of that fact by the Judge is all that is necessary.

         Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Redman v. Gulnac
(Jan 1, 1855)