Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Henry Pierce, Appellant, v. Hugh Kennedy&Ford, Lathrop&Co., Respondents

         No briefs on file.

         JUDGES: Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, C. J., concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The defendants, Ford, Lathrop & Co., were guarantors upon the note which is the foundation of this action. Their liability, according to the decision of this Court, in Riggs v. Waldo , 2 Cal. 485, is strictly that of an indorser, and they were entitled to notice of non-payment, even although the circumstance of the maker's absence might have excused a presentment, and demand upon him. The case cited has been incorrectly reported; the facts in that case should appear similar to the facts in this.

         The Court below was correct in granting a nonsuit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Follows, Riggs v. Waldo , 2 Cal. 486;

Lightstone Laurencel Geiger Clark Reeves Howe Ford Hendricks Tessenden Sumner
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Pierce v. Hugh Kennedy & Ford, Lathrop & Co.
(Jan 1, 1855)