Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE v. PARSONS

         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Terry. Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt concurred. Mr. Chief Justice Murray dissenting.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         The defendant was convicted in the Court below, of the crime of perjury. There is no bill of exceptions or statement of evidence, and the only question presented, is as to the sufficiency of the indictment.

         The indictment charges that defendant in a certain proceeding, describing it, " did willfully, corruptly, and falsely swear," etc.

         It is contended that the indictment is fatally defective, because it is not alleged that the offense of perjury was committed feloniously. Such an allegation was necessary at common law, but our statute has in many respects altered the rules of pleading in criminal cases.

         The indictment in this cause, charged the offense in the words of the statute defining it, and fully complies with the requirements of Section 246 of the Act regulating proceedings in criminal cases. Time, place and circumstance are stated with certainty, and every information is given to the defendant, which is necessary to enable him to answer the charge.

         The judgment of the Court below is affirmed.

         DISSENT:

         MURRAY

         Mr. Chief Justice Murray. I dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Parsons
(Oct 1, 1856)