Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE v. MARTIN

         JUDGES: Mr. Chief Justice Murray delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge.

         That the record in this case is so full of errors as to warrant an immediate reversal, is admitted by the Attorney-General, provided this Court can take notice of the bill of exceptions, which was not signed by the Judge of the Court below within ten days after the trial.

         In the absence of anything appearing to the contrary, the legal intendment would arise from the fact of the bill being signed by the Judge, that the same was done regularly. In fact, it is difficult to see how the failure or refusal to sign a bill of exceptions could defeat the party's right of appeal.

         On examination, it will be found that no analogy whatever exists between this case and the one of Leech v. West (2 Cal. 95).

         Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Martin
(Oct 1, 1856)