Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SHAY v. TUOLUMNE WATER CO.

         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray. Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         This was an action in the Court below for damages for flooding a mining claim with water. The jury found a verdict of fifty dollars and costs for the plaintiff. All the errors are waived by the appellants, except as to the judgment for costs.

         By the 498th section of the Practice Act, it is provided that no costs shall be allowed in an action for money or damages, when the plaintiff recovers less than $ 200. The recovery spoken of means the damages assessed by the jury eo nomine, exclusive of the costs which they may arbitrarily find. (Van Horne v. Petrie, 2 Caine, 213, and Supervisors of Onondaga v. Briggs , 3 Denio, 173.) Costs are an incident to the judgment, to be taxed by the clerk or Court, and cannot be given by the jury by way of damages.

         So much of the judgment of the Court below as allows costs to the plaintiffs, is reversed, and the Court is directed to modify it in conformity with this opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Shay v. Tuolumne Water Co.
(Jul 1, 1856)