Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HUDSON v. DOYLE

         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt. Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the object. If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hudson v. Doyle
(Jan 1, 1856)