Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILSON v. SPRING HILL QUARTZ MINING COMPANY, and GRIFFITH

         JUDGES: Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., concurring.

         OPINION

          BALDWIN, Judge

         The evidence disclosed by the record is not sufficient to sustain the judgment.

         It appears that about the first of June, 1857, plaintiff was in possession of certain land, to enclose which he had begun the construction of a fence; that defendants entered on the land within the contemplated enclosure, and built a house and corral, which house has never been occupied. That afterwards plaintiff proceeded to finish his fence, and that his possession had not been disturbed by defendants, or either of them, from the time when the house and corral were finished until the institution of this action, which was in September, 1857.

         Under these circumstances, the action of forcible entry cannot be maintained. Plaintiff's remedy for the injury complained of is in another form of action, and before a different tribunal.

         Judgment reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz Mining Co.
(Oct 1, 1858)