Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FORD v. RIGBY and IRWIN

         JUDGES: Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          BALDWIN, Judge

         Arnold leased some furniture to Burnes. During the lease, plaintiff bought it of Arnold, Burnes remaining in possession, and acknowledging plaintiff's title. In this condition, it was levied on by Irwin, on process of Rigby against Arnold. Plaintiff filed this bill to enjoin the sale. Defendants made default, and plaintiff had judgment. The only question is, whether an injunction is proper under such circumstances. The question is not as to a levy on the estate of a lessee, for here the property was seized to pay the debt of a stranger to the title. It is true that the lessee might interpose to protect the title; but he may not choose or be able effectually to do so. The owner, having no immediate right of possession, would be embarrassed in his remedy, and might be entirely remediless, unless some preventive remedy were afforded him. We see no objection to the remedy by injunction. Indeed, in such cases, it is the only speedy, adequate, and unembarrassed remedy the lessor has to vindicate his rights.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ford v. Rigby
(Oct 1, 1858)