Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WHITWELL v. THOMAS et al.

         JUDGES: Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The only question for consideration is, whether any material averment of the complaint is denied by the answer. The test of materiality is this: Could the averment be stricken from the pleading without leaving it insufficient? (Practice Act, Sec. 66.) Judged by this test, the averment of copartnership is immaterial. The complaint would be sufficient if this were stricken out. The execution of the notes, not the copartnership of the defendants at the time, constitutes the material averment, and this is not controverted.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Whitwell v. Thomas
(Apr 1, 1858)