Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARTIN v. TRAVERS

         JUDGES: Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The plaintiff objected to the admission of the evidence upon which the referee based his sixth finding, but upon what ground the record does not disclose. The objection fails to specify the point upon which it rests, and did not merit consideration for its generality. Kiler v. Kimball, 10 Cal. 267.

         To have entitled it to notice, the party should have laid, as the authorities say, his finger on the point at the time. Practice Act. sec. 189; Frier v. Jackson, 8 John. 496; Jackson v. Caldwell, 1 Cow. 622; Whitesides v. Jackson, 1 Wend. 418; Waters v. Gilbert, 2 Cushing, 27; Covillaud v. Tanner, 7 Cal. 38.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Martin v. Travers
(Jan 1, 1859)