Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

RITTER v. STOCK et al.

         JUDGES: Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         The questions presented by the record, are purely questions of fact.

         The case was submitted to the jury on special issues, which were found in favor of defendant.

         The evidence on the questions submitted was conflicting, and the verdict depended upon the weight which the jury attached to the testimony of each witness. Upon this point, the jury, having heard the testimony and observed the manner of the various witnesses produced before them, had better opportunities of forming a correct judgment than the Appellate Court from merely reading the statement of the evidence; and we are not disposed--although this is an equity case, and the verdict of the jury is not binding on the Court--to interfere with the verdict and ruling of the Judge who tried the cause.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ritter v. Stock
(Jan 1, 1859)