Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MENDIOCA et als. v. ORR.

         JUDGES: Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J. concurring.

         OPINION

         COPE, Judge

         In this case, an appeal from a Justice's Court to the County Court of Santa Cruz county was dismissed, on the ground that the record did not show that the notice of appeal had been served upon the adverse party. The appellant offered to prove by affidavit that the service had in fact been made, but the Court declined to admit the proof. This was clearly erroneous. The fact of service was the important matter, and it was of no consequence that its existence was not shown by the record. If the service was made, the jurisdiction had attached; and to show that it was made, the affidavit of the appellant was competent and proper evidence.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Mendioca v. Orr.
(Oct 1, 1860)