Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  •           Robinson, Beatty & Heacock, for Appellant, cited 2 Carr. & Payne, 119; 4 Barn. & Cress, 15; Chitty on Cont. 188-9.           Heydenfeldt, for Respondent, cited 7 Cal. 428; 9 Id. 477; 10 Id. 483, as to description; and Imlay v. Carpentier, 14 Cal. 173, to the point that plaintiff had mistaken his remedy, and that equity had no jurisdiction.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  •           Robinson, Beatty & Heacock, for Appellant, cited 2 Carr. & Payne, 119; 4 Barn. & Cress, 15; Chitty on Cont. 188-9.           Heydenfeldt, for Respondent, cited 7 Cal. 428; 9 Id. 477; 10 Id. 483, as to description; and Imlay v. Carpentier, 14 Cal. 173, to the point that plaintiff had mistaken his remedy, and that equity had no jurisdiction.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

GREEN v. THOMAS

         JUDGES: Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, C. J. concurring.

         OPINION

         COPE, Judge

         If the plaintiff is entitled to relief, he has a sufficient remedy by motion; and upon that ground the judgment is affirmed. (Imlay v. Carpentier, 14 Cal. 173 .)

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

Green v. Thomas
(Oct 1, 1860)