Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE v. AH FUNG et al.

         JUDGES: Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J. concurring.

         OPINION

         COPE, Judge

         On the trial of this case, the Court instructed the jury, that if the evidence of one of the witnesses was true, the defendants were guilty of murder in the first degree. This witness did not see the deceased after the commission of the offense, and his testimony did not establish the homicide. It is contended that there was no controversy upon that point, and that the Court was correct in assuming the existence of the fact. We do not know, nor can we ascertain, what particular matters were controverted before the jury, but we think the Court had no right to assume the existence of any fact not expressly admitted.

         It follows that the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Ah Fung
(Jul 1, 1860)