Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BAY v. POPE

         JUDGES: Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Cope, J. concurring.

         OPINION

          BALDWIN, Judge

         Appeal and cross appeal. The judgment is affirmed in the direct appeal, with costs.

         In the cross appeal the judgment is erroneous, in allowing the recoupments for the improvements against the mesne profits found by the jury: 1. The improvements were made before the plaintiff's title accrued. 2. The case made by the finding and pleadings does not bring the defendant within the Practice Act (Sec. 257.) The holding of the defendant was not adverse within the section. (See 13 Cal. 487, and cases.)

         The last cause--on cross appeal--is remanded, that the proper judgment may be entered on the finding, by adding the yearly rent as damages in the judgment.

         Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bay v. Pope
(Jul 1, 1861)