Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CAULFIELD v. SANDERS

         JUDGES: Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Cope, J. concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         On petition for rehearing, Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court--Cope, J. concurring.

         Petition for rehearing. The objection taken to the instruction given by the Court, of its own motion, is more technical than substantial. It could not have prejudiced the defendant. There was no conflicting evidence in the case; and that produced, considered in connection with the answer, necessarily led to the result arrived at by the jury. (See Terry v. Sickles , 13 Cal. 427.)

         The counsel for the petitioner is mistaken in supposing the verdict was rendered for one sum, and the judgment entered for another and greater sum. That portion of the transcript to which he refers is contradicted by the verdict itself, which accompanies the record.

         Rehearing denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Caulfield v. Sanders
(Apr 1, 1861)