Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JAMES CROOK v. WILLIAM K. FORSYTH

         JUDGES: Shafter, J. Mr. Justice Sanderson expressed no opinion.

         OPINION

          SHAFTER, Judge

         A new trial was asked for below, on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision of the Court on the merits.

         The burden of proof under the issues joined was upon the defendant, and his testimony was so far inconsistent with itself that the Court, acting advisedly, could not, in our judgment, have come to any other conclusion than it did. There was a conflict in the testimony, and it was all the more fatal for being intestine.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Crook v. Forsyth
(Oct 1, 1866)