Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

DAVID JOBSON v. MARTIN FENNELL

         JUDGES: Sanderson, J.

         OPINION

          SANDERSON, Judge

         The general rule of the common law is, that officers who exercise judicial functions cannot act by deputy, but those who exercise merely ministerial functions may, without express authority to that effect. Accordingly, it was early settled that a Sheriff, in the exercise of his ministerial functions, could act by deputy; but otherwise, in respect to his judicial functions, because no express authority to that effect was given in his patent. (Gwynne on Sheriffs, 38.) So in respect to constables. (Medhurst v. Waite, 3 Burr. 1259; Rex v. Clark, 1 Durnford and East, 679; Willcock on Constables, 17, 15; 13 Law Library, N. S.)

         The statute of this State in relation to constables is silent as to the appointment of deputies. (Stats. 1850, p. 263.) Such being the case, the rule of the common law applies, and it has accordingly been held that constables may act by deputy in the exercise of their ministerial functions. (Taylor v. Brown, 4 Cal. 188.)

         Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in this opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jobson v. Fennell
(Jul 1, 1868)