Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BERNAL v. WADE

         OPINION          By the Court:

         The time to file the petition for a rehearing expired on November eighth. The petition was placed in the express office at San Jose for transmission to the Clerk of this Court, and should have reached him in time to be filed, but it was not, in fact, received until the tenth of November, when the remittitur had been sent to the Court below. The case is not distinguishable from that of Hanson v. McCue , 43 Cal. 178, and the remittitur must, therefore, be recalled and the petition for a rehearing placed on file.

         So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bernal v. Wade
(Oct 1, 1873)