Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILBUR CURTISS v. THOMAS SPRAGUE and CHARLES E. HUSE

         JUDGES: Wallace, C. J. Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

         OPINION

          WALLACE, Judge

         The counter-claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, and, under the provisions of the Practice Act, the plaintiff must be considered to have pleaded the statute by way of replication to the counter-claim.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Curtiss v. Sprague
(Oct 1, 1874)