Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SARAH A. POWELL v. JAS. N. POWELL, IVORY T. NASON, J. D. LAUGENOR, ROBERT ROBERTS and G. F. GUSHAW

         OPINION          By the Court:

         The condition of each of the two bonds by the executor is identical; the burden of the sureties the same, and their consequent liability inter sese to contribution clear. The complaint, therefore, though proceeding upon both bonds, was not open to the objection that several causes of action had been improperly united. Nor was there a misjoinder of parties defendant. The sureties who are sued, as observed already, though executing separate bonds, assumed a common burden, and as being sureties on separate instruments, may be properly joined as co-defendants in the action. ( Code Civil Proc. Sec. 383.)

         The judgment is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrers of the defendants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Powell v. Powell
(Apr 1, 1874)