Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILLIAM KING v. W. W. MONTGOMERY

         There is no allegation of want of probable cause in any part of the complaint. (Levy v. Brannan , 39 Cal. 488; Grant v. Moore , 29 Cal. 647; Ellis v. Thilman, 3 Call, 3; Young v. Gregorie, 3 Call, 446; Davis v. Clough , 8 N.H. 157; Maddox v. McGinnis, 7 Mon. 371; Smith v. Story, 4 Humph. 169; Lindsay v. Larned , 17 Mass. 193.)

         JUDGES: Niles, J.

         OPINION

          NILES, Judge

         The complaint contained no averment that the action against Dobbs and King was commenced, or the writ of attachment sued out and prosecuted, without probable cause. In this the complaint was clearly insufficient, and the plaintiff declining to amend, the motion to dismiss was properly granted.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

King v. Montgomery
(Jul 1, 1875)