Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE BANK OF MENDOCINO v. S. J. CHALFANT

Real estate, valued at

$ 100 00

Improvements thereon

400 00

Money on hand

7,878 00

Solvent debts, promissory notes and mortgages

29,388 00

Making in the aggregate the sum of

$ 37,766 00"

         JUDGES: Niles, J. Neither Mr. Chief Justice Wallace nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

         OPINION

          NILES, Judge

         No points have been filed by the respondent, and we are not informed upon what ground he relies to sustain the ruling of the court upon his demurrer. The complaint contains an extract from the assessment-roll of the county, from which it appears that there was listed to the plaintiff, among other items, " solvent debts, promissory notes and mortgages." This item was stated separately from the other and undisputed items of the assessment, and its valuation was separately given. It is now beyond question that solvent debts, notes and mortgages are not the subjects of taxation, and that the assessment was pro tanto illegal and void. (People v. Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, ante, p. 243.)

         It is further alleged that the plaintiff tendered to the collector the amount of taxes upon the parcels of property admitted to have been legally listed, and acceptance was refused by him upon the ground that he had no means of separating the illegal from the legal portion of the tax. But evidently, this separation could have been accomplished by a very simple mathematical computation. The complaint states the case of an illegal tax, paid under protest, for the recovery of which the plaintiff undoubtedly had its action.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bank of Mendocino v. Chalfant
(Jul 1, 1876)