Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ISAAC BAGGS et al. v. CHAS. S. SMITH

         OPINION          By the Court:

         The findings filed June 4th, 1877, are insufficient to support the judgment entered on that day, in that they did not respond to the issue joined upon the counter-claim of the defendant for the alleged loan of moneys to the plaintiffs. It is the settled rule that the material issues made by the pleadings must be responded to by the findings.

         The order of August 6th, 1877, amending the findings, was also erroneous, if for no other, for the reason that the cause was then pending in this Court upon appeal from the judgment, and under such circumstances the Court below had no authority to make new or further findings in the cause.

         Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baggs v. Smith
(Apr 1, 1878)