Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

F. RHODA et al. v. ALAMEDA COUNTY

         OPINION

         The Court:

         The Court found that the vault, at the time of its removal, was a fixture, and part of the realty, and was the property of plaintiffs; that defendants had no legal right to remove it; and that its value, to be sold in open market, was, at the time of its removal, not over five hundred dollars; and thereupon the Court rendered judgment for that amount. In such case the measure of damages is the value of the article as it was in place as a part of the realty, immediately preceding its removal; not what it would sell for in open market removed from the building. ( Civ. Code, § 3333; Whitbeck v. N.Y. Central R. R. Co., 36 Barb. 644.)

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Rhoda v. Alameda County
(Jul 1, 1881)