Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

G. A. HEINLEN ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. J. T. SULLIVAN ET AL., JUDGES, ETC., RESPONDENTS

         OPINION

         PER CURIAM.

         In Bank

         The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

         Conceding that the terms of office of the police commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco have expired, the power of appointment does not devolve upon the judges of the Superior Court for the city and county aforesaid.

         The power of appointment of the commissioners referred to vested in the judges of the fifteenth, twelfth, and fourth judicial districts of this State by the Act of April, 1878, was not a judicial power, and did not pertain to the judicial system of the State; consequently it was not continued in force by section 11 of article xxii. of the Constitution now in force, and the power of appointment in question did not devolve upon the superior judges above mentioned.

         Application for writ of mandate denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Heinlen v. Sullivan
(Dec 10, 1883)