Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

A. W. REYNOLDS, PETITIONER, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RESPONDENT

         OPINION

         PER CURIAM.

         In Bank          The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

         By means of certiorari the petitioner seeks to call in question the validity of a judgment and an order made and entered considerably more than one year before the presentation of his petition. In Keys v. Marin County, 42 Cal. 256, it was held that unless circumstances of an extraordinary character be shown to have intervened, the remedy through a writ of certiorari should be held to be barred by the lapse of the same length of time that bars an appeal from a final judgment.

         In the present case no excuse is shown for the delay in the application.

         Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Reynolds v. Superior Court
(Nov 30, 1883)