Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

F. H. ROSS, APPELLANT, v. JAMES BRUSIE, RESPONDENT

         OPINION

         PER CURIAM.

         We are of opinion that the court erred in sustaining the objection on the ground of incompetency to the following question put to the plaintiff while testifying: "Did you at any time within three years have any conversation with the defendant relative to the execution of this deed and bond?"

         Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.

         Hearing in Bank denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ross v. Brusie
(Oct 24, 1883)