Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILLIAM C. HARRIS et al., Appellants, v. MARIE HILLEGASS, Administratrix, etc., of William Hillegass, Deceased, et al., Respondents

         JUDGES: McKinstry, J. McKee, J., and Ross, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          McKINSTRY, Judge

         There was evidence to sustain the finding that the partnership created by the contract of June 26, 1849, was dissolved more than twenty years before the commencement of this action. As the dissolution occurred more than twenty years before the commencement of the action, the court below -- a court of equity -- was justified in refusing to entertain plaintiff's application for relief. And, as laches deprives a plaintiff of the right to appeal to a court of equity, the court may refuse to entertain a suit brought after unreasonable delay, although the defendant has not, in his answer, alleged that the claim is stale. (Sullivan v. Portland, etc., R. R. Co ., 94 U.S. 811.) Judgment and order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Harris v. Hillegass
(Nov 6, 1884)