AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO., RESPONDENT, v. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL., APPELLANTS

         OPINION          The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

         THE COURT.

         This action was brought to condemn land for the use of a railroad. The defendant demanded a change of venue on the ground that its principal place of business was in the city and county of San Francisco, and that the action should have been there commenced. The court denied the motion. Sufficient authority for the order of the court is found in section 1243 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which declares that actions of this character must be brought in the Superior Court of the county in which the property is situated. The real estate sought to be condemned is in San Bernardino County; therefore, [4 P. 389] that was the proper county for the commencement of the action, and for its trial. For this reason, and also for the reasons given in Cal. S.R.R. Co. v. S.P.R.R. Co. ante, p. 293, the order is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

California Southern Railroad Co. v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
(Jul 19, 1884)